From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Health Enhancement Prods., Inc. v. Ceptazyme, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
Case No. 12-10948 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10948

06-14-2012

HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CEPTAZYME, LLC and ZUS HEALTH LLC, Defendants.


Hon: AVERN COHN


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Reconsideration Of This Court's May 17, 2012, Order Granting Defendants' Motion To Dismiss For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. 120).

The motion is DENIED.

L.R. 7.1(L)(3) requires the movant in a motion for reconsideration to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court has been misled. Nothing in the motion papers suggests the Court has been misled. The fact that Xooma Worldwide may be doing business in Michigan does not mean defendants were doing business in Michigan.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________

AVERN COHN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, June 14, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager


Summaries of

Health Enhancement Prods., Inc. v. Ceptazyme, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
Case No. 12-10948 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Health Enhancement Prods., Inc. v. Ceptazyme, LLC

Case Details

Full title:HEALTH ENHANCEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CEPTAZYME, LLC and ZUS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10948 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 14, 2012)