From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Health Central v. Cesar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 28, 2000
752 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 1D99-614.

Opinion filed February 28, 2000.

An appeal from an order entered by Judge of Compensation Claims Richard S. Thompson.

Pamela J. Cox and Michael D. Rouse of Cox Rouse, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Paul Perkins, Orlando and Bill McCabe, Longwood, for Appellee.


We conclude that the judge of compensation claims erred in precluding the employer and carrier from asserting a defense based on the statute of limitations. An employer who fails to provide an employee with the informational brochure required by section 440.185, Florida Statutes may be estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense, see Gaines v. Orange County Public Utilities, 710 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), but estoppel is not a bar to the defense in the present case because the claimant had actual knowledge of her rights under the worker's compensation laws. See Solar Pane Insulating Glass, Inc. v. Hanssen, 727 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Accordingly, we must reverse the final order awarding benefits to the claimant.

WEBSTER, KAHN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Health Central v. Cesar

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 28, 2000
752 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Health Central v. Cesar

Case Details

Full title:HEALTH CENTRAL d/b/a WEST ORANGE MANOR and SEDGWICK JAMES OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

752 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Crutcher v. School Bd., Broward Cty

Implicit in this court's decision in Coleman was a rejection of Appellant's claim that a claimant need only…