From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Healey v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jun 7, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV131, CRIMINAL NO. 1:04CR44-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jun. 7, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV131, CRIMINAL NO. 1:04CR44-1.

June 7, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On August 31, 2006, pro se petitioner, Gerald Lee Healey, filed a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull for initial screening and a report and recommendation in accordance with Local Rule of Prisoner Litigation 83.09.

On May 8, 2007, Magistrate Judge Kaull issued an Opinion and Report and Recommendation recommending that Healey's Motion Under § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody be denied as untimely and the case be dismissed with prejudice as untimely. The Magistrate Judge determined that Healey's § 2255 motion filed on August 31, 2006 was untimely because "the facts giving rise to the petitioner's claims could have, or should have been known through due diligence much sooner" and further found that Healey's § 2255 petition was subject to the time limitations of the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.

The Report and Recommendation also specifically warned that failure to object to the recommendation would result in the waiver of any appellate rights on this issue. No objections were filed.

The failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives the appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a de novo review of the issue presented. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-153 (1985); Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1997).

Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Motion Under § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Docket No. 30 in 1:04CR44-1 and Docket No. 1 in 1:06CV131) and ORDERS Healey's case DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and stricken from the Court's docket.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the pro se petitioner, certified mail, return receipt requested and to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Healey v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Jun 7, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV131, CRIMINAL NO. 1:04CR44-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jun. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Healey v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:GERALD LEE HEALEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Jun 7, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV131, CRIMINAL NO. 1:04CR44-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jun. 7, 2006)