From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Headrick v. Haynes

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 10, 2023
3:22-cv-05895-TL-TLF (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05895-TL-TLF

05-10-2023

JOHN GRIFFIN HEADRICK, Petitioner, v. RON HAYNES, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION

Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge

On May 1, 2023, petitioner filed a “Motion for Extension of Time to File a Traverse to Respondent's Answer.” Dkt. 25. It appears that petitioner is seeking an extension of time to file a response to respondent's answer. Id. Petitioner states he needs additional time due to a scheduled sinus surgery. Id. Petitioner requests an additional thirty (30) days. Respondents do not oppose petitioner's motion. Dkt. 26.

The Court finds good cause exists for an extension and GRANTS the motion. The Court orders that the schedule for briefing the petition in this matter is revised as follows:

• Petitioner may file a response to the Answer on or before June 16, 2023;
• The petition shall be noted for consideration and respondent may file their optional reply on June 23, 2023.


Summaries of

Headrick v. Haynes

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 10, 2023
3:22-cv-05895-TL-TLF (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Headrick v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:JOHN GRIFFIN HEADRICK, Petitioner, v. RON HAYNES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 10, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-05895-TL-TLF (W.D. Wash. May. 10, 2023)