From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Headd v. Parts Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 12, 2021
21 Civ. 6219 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 6219 (LGS)

08-12-2021

MAURICE HEADD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PARTS AUTHORITY LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, United States District Judge

WHEREAS, this case has been assigned to me for all purposes;

WHEREAS, this case was transferred to the Southern District of New York from the District of Arizona so Plaintiffs could “join the similarly situated plaintiffs in Henao v. Parts Authority LLC, et al., Case No. 19-10720” (Dkt. No. 54). It is hereby

ORDERED that, by August 19, 2021, Plaintiffs shall file a letter not to exceed four single-spaced pages (1) explaining whether Plaintiffs are part of the putative FLSA collective in Henao, (2) identifying any reason why this case should not be consolidated with Henao and (3) proposing next steps in light of their responses to the prior questions. Defendants may (but need not) file a response by August 24, 2021.


Summaries of

Headd v. Parts Auth.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 12, 2021
21 Civ. 6219 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Headd v. Parts Auth.

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE HEADD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PARTS AUTHORITY LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 6219 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2021)