From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Head v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 7, 1936
167 So. 349 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)

Opinion

8 Div. 976.

April 7, 1936.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.

Oscar Head was convicted of petit larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

W. C. Rayburn, of Guntersville, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The corpus delicti in this case was proven by Russell Eddings, the party injured, and was not disputed.

The state then introduced John Graves, who testified that he and another feloniously took and carried away from the cotton house of Eddings, about 200 pounds of seed cotton of the value of $4, and that he was employed by the defendant to do this, and for which he was paid by the defendant the sum of $3.

After the taking of the testimony in the case and a full and fair charge by the court, setting forth the law, and after the giving of 34 written charges at the request of the defendant, meeting the various phases of his contention, the court refused to give to the defendant charges 1, 2, 3, and 4, which were requested by the defendant upon the theory that the witness, Graves, was an accomplice, and no conviction could be had on his uncorroborated testimony.

Section 5635 of the Code of 1923 has application only in cases of felony, and, this being a prosecution for misdemeanor, the charges were properly refused.

We have examined the record as required by the statute and each exception reserved by the defendant. In them we find no error which would warrant a reversal of this judgment. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Head v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 7, 1936
167 So. 349 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
Case details for

Head v. State

Case Details

Full title:HEAD v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 7, 1936

Citations

167 So. 349 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
167 So. 349

Citing Cases

Mickey v. State

A conviction may be had in misdemeanor cases on uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice. Denham v. State,…

Judge v. State

The statute prohibiting a conviction for felony upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is not…