From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Head Sport GmbH v. Up Town Sport Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 29, 2024
23-CV-10172 (LAK) (RFT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-10172 (LAK) (RFT)

01-29-2024

Head Sport GmbH, Plaintiff, v. Up Town Sport Inc., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court received an ex parte communication from Defendant Sprizzo dated January 17, 2024 (“Sprizzo Letter”), which was subsequently filed on the docket. On January 25, 2024, Plaintiff filed a letter motion seeking to seal the Sprizzo Letter and its attachments. (See ECF 24.) In accordance with my Individual Rules of Practice, Plaintiff re-filed redacted versions of the Sprizzo Letter and its attachments on the docket. (See ECF Nos. 25, 27.)

After reviewing Plaintiff's letter motion and proposed redactions (ECF Nos. 24, 26, 28), Plaintiff's application is GRANTED. ECF Nos. 20-1, 21, 26 and 28 shall remain sealed.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Head Sport GmbH v. Up Town Sport Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 29, 2024
23-CV-10172 (LAK) (RFT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Head Sport GmbH v. Up Town Sport Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Head Sport GmbH, Plaintiff, v. Up Town Sport Inc., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 29, 2024

Citations

23-CV-10172 (LAK) (RFT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 29, 2024)