From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heacox v. Ciolek

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
Jul 20, 2015
238 Cal.App.4th 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. G049510.

07-20-2015

NATHAN HEACOX, Defendant and Respondent. OMAR BERMUDEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FAITH CIOLEK, Defendant and Appellant


[Modification of opinion (237 Cal.App.4th 1311; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on June 22, 2015, be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

On page 31, lines 6 and 7 [237 Cal.App.4th 1337, 1st par., line 12] from the top of the page, delete "as stated in footnote 7 of this opinion" and insert in its place "as stated in footnote 6 of this opinion."

The petition for rehearing is DENIED.

The modification does not change the judgment.

Bedsworth, Acting P. J., and Moore, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Heacox v. Ciolek

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.
Jul 20, 2015
238 Cal.App.4th 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Heacox v. Ciolek

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN HEACOX, Defendant and Respondent. OMAR BERMUDEZ, Plaintiff and…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Date published: Jul 20, 2015

Citations

238 Cal.App.4th 582 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)