From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H&E Equip. Servs., Inc. v. URS Corp.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2017
NO. 2017 CW 0955 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017 CW 0955

08-14-2017

H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. v. URS CORPORATION ARCHITECTURE, PC, URS CORPORATION, L. O'NEAL JOHNSON AND THOMAS E. RYAN, II


In Re: URS Corporation Architecture, P.C., URS Corporation, L. O'Neal Johnson and Thomas Ryan, III, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 626308. BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., HOLDRIDGE AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART WITH ORDER. From the writ application, it appears that the trial court did not comply with the requirements of La. C.C.P. art. 1425(F) in denying the motions in limine filed by URS Corporation Architecture, P.C., URS Corporation, L. O'Neal Johnson, and Thomas Ryan, II, in which they sought to exclude the testimony of two potential experts. Because of this legal error, we vacate the rulings of the trial court that denied the motions, and we remand this matter to the trial court to conduct hearings and to provide all information as required under La. C.C.P. art. 1425(F).

AHP

VGW

Holdridge, J., concurs. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

H&E Equip. Servs., Inc. v. URS Corp.

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
Aug 14, 2017
NO. 2017 CW 0955 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2017)
Case details for

H&E Equip. Servs., Inc. v. URS Corp.

Case Details

Full title:H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. v. URS CORPORATION ARCHITECTURE, PC, URS…

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 14, 2017

Citations

NO. 2017 CW 0955 (La. Ct. App. Aug. 14, 2017)