It is well settled that evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is also inadmissible upon summary judgment. HCP IIIWoodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Sues. Group, 254 Ga. App. 242, 244 ( 562 SE2d 225) (2002). Furthermore, "[h]earsay, opinions, and conclusions in affidavits are inadmissible on summary judgment.
We therefore affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the City and denial of Latimore's motion for summary judgment. HCP III Woodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Svcs. Group, 254 Ga. App. 242, 244 ( 562 SE2d 225) (2002). See, e.g., City of Atlanta v. Miller, 256 Ga. App. 819, 820 (2) ( 569 SE2d 907) (2002) (claim against city for improperly calculated back pay requires analysis of ordinance).
Wynn v. City of Warner Robins, 279 Ga. App. 42, 51 (4) (630 SE2d 574)(2006).HCP III Woodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Sues. Group, 254 Ga. App. 242, 246 (562 SE2d 225)(2002).Williams v. City of Social Circle, 225 Ga. App. 746, 748 (484 SE2d 687)(1997).
" (Footnote omitted.) HCP III Woodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Svcs. Group, 254 Ga. App. 242, 246 ( 562 SE2d 225) (2002). First, it is unclear from the record precisely how much time elapsed between Davis's June 7 examination and when she made the statements to the two witnesses.
It is well settled that evidence that would be inadmissible at trial is also inadmissible upon summary judgment. HCP III Woodstock, Inc. v. Healthcare Svcs. Group, 254 Ga. App. 242, 244 ( 562 SE2d 225) (2002). Furthermore, "[h]earsay, opinions, and conclusions in affidavits are inadmissible on summary judgment.