Opinion
08-17-2016
Heslop & Kalba LLP, Brooklyn, NY (Garfield A. Heslop of counsel), for appellants. Warner & Scheuerman, New York, NY (Jonathon D. Warner and Karl E. Scheuerman of counsel), for respondent.
Heslop & Kalba LLP, Brooklyn, NY (Garfield A. Heslop of counsel), for appellants.
Warner & Scheuerman, New York, NY (Jonathon D. Warner and Karl E. Scheuerman of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Sophia Leahing and Gary Cole appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kurtz, J.), dated May 19, 2015, which denied their cross motion, inter alia, to vacate two orders of the same court dated December 17, 2013, and March 10, 2014.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants in this commercial mortgage foreclosure action contend that they were entitled to vacatur of two prior orders of the Supreme Court because their former attorneys' conduct constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. “[I]n the context of civil litigation, an attorney's errors or omissions are binding on the client and, absent extraordinary circumstances, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel will not be entertained” (Mendoza v. Plaza Homes, LLC, 55 A.D.3d 692, 693, 865 N.Y.S.2d 342 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Nugent v. Diocese of Rockville Ctr., 137 A.D.3d 760, 761, 26 N.Y.S.3d 556 ; Eastern Capital Group, LLC v. 26 Realty Bldrs. USA, Inc., 81 A.D.3d 686, 687, 916 N.Y.S.2d 776 ; McVeigh v. Curry, 74 A.D.3d 915, 916, 902 N.Y.S.2d 371 ; Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Portes, 290 A.D.2d 905, 906, 737 N.Y.S.2d 667 ). Here, the appellants failed to establish the existence of any extraordinary circumstances. Accordingly, the court properly denied the appellants' cross motion, inter alia, to vacate the two prior orders on the ground that their former attorneys were ineffective.
The parties' remaining contentions need not be reached in light of our determination.
CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.