From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HBH v. State

Supreme Court of Washington.
Sep 6, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 94529-2

09-06-2017

HBH; SAH; and Trey Hamrick, Respondents, v. STATE of Washington, et al., Petitioners.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its September 5, 2017, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

HBH v. State

Supreme Court of Washington.
Sep 6, 2017
189 Wn. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

HBH v. State

Case Details

Full title:HBH; SAH; and Trey Hamrick, Respondents, v. STATE of Washington, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Sep 6, 2017

Citations

189 Wn. 2d 1002 (Wash. 2017)
189 Wash. 2d 1002
404 P.3d 1162

Citing Cases

Wrigley v. State

We decline to address this claim under RAP 9.12. ¶ 72 The Wrigleys rely on HBH v. State , 197 Wash. App. 77,…

H.B.H. v. State

Id. at 92-95, 387 P.3d 1093. The court remanded for trial on the preadoption negligence claims. We granted…