From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.B. v. Pittsburgh Pub. Sch.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 12, 2021
Civil Action No. 19-1326 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-1326

01-12-2021

H.B., by and through PATRICIA F., as her Parent and legal guardian, and PATRICIA F., individually, Plaintiffs, v. PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DISTRICT, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE of PITTSBURGH, and LAVALLE TUCKER, Defendants, v. PAUL K. BROWN, t/d/b/a PROFESSIONAL LIMOUSINE SERVICE, Third-Party Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Lenihan ECF Nos. 89, 93 & 100 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff H.B. ("Minor Plaintiff") by and through Patricia F. ("Plaintiff Mother"), as her parent and legal guardian, and Patricia F., individually (collectively "Plaintiffs"), filed this civil action on October 16, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 100), filed on December 15, 2020, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant the Children's Institute of Pittsburgh (ECF No. 89) be granted. It further recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Third-Party Defendant Paul K. Brown, Inc. t/d/b/a Professional Limousine Service (ECF No. 93), be denied. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). Objections were due on December 29, 2020 for registered ECF Users and on January 4, 2021 for unregistered users. As to registered users, only Plaintiffs filed objections by the deadline (ECF No. 101). Defendant the Children's Institute of Pittsburgh filed a Reply to the Objections on January 6, 2021 (ECF No. 102).

After review of the pleadings, documents in the case, Objections and the Reply to the Objections, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 12th day of January 2021,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Children's Institute of Pittsburgh (ECF No. 89) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Third-Party Defendant Paul K. Brown, Inc. t/d/b/a Professional Limousine Service (ECF No. 93) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 100) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated December 15, 2020, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate the Children's Institute of Pittsburgh as a party defendant.

s/David Stewart Cercone

David Stewart Cercone

Senior United States District Judge cc: Joel S. Sansone, Esquire

Elizabeth Tuttle, Esquire

Massimo A. Terzigni, Esquire

Jaime N. Doherty, Esquire

Aimee Rankin Zundel, Esquire

Matthew Fergus, Esquire

George N. Stewart, Esquire

Joseph F. Butcher, Esquire

Carmen L. Robinson, Esquire

(Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

H.B. v. Pittsburgh Pub. Sch.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 12, 2021
Civil Action No. 19-1326 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2021)
Case details for

H.B. v. Pittsburgh Pub. Sch.

Case Details

Full title:H.B., by and through PATRICIA F., as her Parent and legal guardian, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 12, 2021

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-1326 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 12, 2021)