From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hazen v. Home Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-00266-WBS-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-CV-00266-WBS-GGH

09-14-2011

RICK LEE HAZEN Plaintiff, v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Stewart C. Altemus Attorney for Defendants


ALTEMUS & WAGNER

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

STEWART C. ALTEMUS (State Bar No. 98746)

Attorney for Plaintiff

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR

TELEPHONICALLY AT HEARING ON

THE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

SCHEDULING ORDER

Date: September 26, 2011

Time: 2:00 p.m.

Courtroom: 5

Judge: William B. Shubb

Plaintiff, RICK LEE HAZEN, by and through his attorney, Stewart C. Altemus, requests permission to appear telephonically at the Motion for Relief From Scheduling Order on September 26, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable William B. Shubb, Judge Presiding.

This request is made on the following grounds: Monday, September 26, 2011, is a regular law and motion day in Shasta County Superior Court. Mr. Altemus presently has two matters on law and motion at the Shasta County Superior Court at 8:30 a.m., three matters at 9:00 a.m. and a court call with the Plumas County Superior Court at 2:30 p.m. in the matter of Bauer v Almanor Manufacturing.

Additionally, Mr. Altemus's partner, Darryl Wagner, passed away in May of last year. Mr. Altemus is now a sole practitioner and does not have anyone else that can personally appear for him at the scheduled law and motion hearings on September 26, 2011 which are in conflict with this hearing. He, therefore, respectfully requests that he be allowed to appear telephonically.

The direct telephone number for Stewart C. Altemus is (530) 242-8800.

ALTEMUS & WAGNER

Stewart C. Altemus

Attorney for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Stewart C. Altemus be and is hereby allowed to appear telephonically at the hearing on the Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines scheduled for September 26, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. The courtroom deputy shall issue an email to counsel with instructions on how to participate in the telephone conference call

WILLIAM B. SHUBB

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby declare that I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1255 Sacramento Street, Redding, California 96001. On the date indicated below, I served true copies of the following document(s):

PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE SCHEDULING ORDER

_X by mail on the following party(ies) in said action, in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §1013(a), by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope in a designated area for outgoing mail, addressed as set forth below. In the ordinary course of business at Altemus & Wagner, mail placed in that designated area is given the correct amount of postage and is deposited that same day in a United States mailbox in the City of Redding, California. __ by overnight delivery on the following party(ies) in said action, in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §1013(c), by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope, with delivery fees paid or provided for, in a designated area for outgoing overnight mail, addressed as set forth below. In the ordinary course of business at Altemus & Wagner, mail placed in that designated area is picked up that same day for delivery the following business day. __ by facsimile transmission, in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure §1013(e), to the following party(ies) at the facsimile number(s) indicated, I caused such documents to be telefaxed to the designated fax numbers. __ by personally delivering a true copy thereof to the person and at the address set forth below.

Caitlin E. Carey

Burnham Brown

1901 Harrison Street, 11th Floor

Oakland CA 94612

Joshua S. Goodman

Jenkins Goodman Newman & Hamilton

Executed on September 14, 2011, at Redding, California. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Bonnie Prather


Summaries of

Hazen v. Home Depot, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 14, 2011
Case No. 2:10-CV-00266-WBS-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Hazen v. Home Depot, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICK LEE HAZEN Plaintiff, v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and DOES 1 through 10…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-CV-00266-WBS-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 14, 2011)