Haywood v. Vance

Full title: In re Keith Haywood, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 5, 2017

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6996 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

4615 456/16 4180 116/17

10-05-2017

In re Keith Haywood, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., etc., Respondent.

Keith Haywood, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Melanie Soberal of counsel), for respondent.

Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.

Keith Haywood, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Melanie Soberal of counsel), for respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 5, 2017

CLERK