From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haywood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1992
615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-02737.

December 11, 1992.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.


The appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed. He argues that he had previously filed a motion for postconviction relief that was dismissed without prejudice by the trial court. Apparently, the motion on review here was the resubmission of that motion. If correct, the court erred in denying the motion as untimely filed. See Lemus v. State, 585 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, since the appellant's postconviction relief motion fails on its merits, we affirm.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haywood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 11, 1992
615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Haywood v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN HAYWOOD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 11, 1992

Citations

615 So. 2d 707 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

The trial court erred in denying his motion as time-barred. See Haywood v. State, 615 So.2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA…

Miller v. State

The trial court erred in denying his motion as time-barred. See Haywood v. State, 615 So.2d 707 (Fla. 2d DCA…