From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haywood v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 20, 1986
482 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1986)

Opinion

No. 66994.

February 20, 1986.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decision; Fourth District — Case No. 84-85.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Allen J. DeWeese, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Robert S. Jaegers, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We have for review Haywood v. State, 466 So.2d 424 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), which directly conflicts with Whitehead v. State, 450 So.2d 545 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. On the authority of State v. Whitehead, 472 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1985), we approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDONALD and SHAW, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Haywood v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 20, 1986
482 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1986)
Case details for

Haywood v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HAYWOOD, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 20, 1986

Citations

482 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1986)

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Reclassification and mandatory minimum provisions operate independently of one another and are not…

Kio v. State

The statute is phrased in mandatory terms. See Haywood v. State, 466 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985),…