Summary
holding that a police officer who suffered an injury to his ring finger was not "disabled" where his ability to perform certain manual tasks was diminished but not "substantially limited"
Summary of this case from Balonze v. Town Fair Tire Centers, Inc.Opinion
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding.
Before REINHARDT, SILVERMAN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Clarence Haywood appeals pro se from the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim. In his action, Haywood alleges that three Ninth Circuit Judges rendered erroneous judgments and committed reversible error in violation of his constitutional rights.
Because Judges Hawkins, Tashima and Gould are entitled to absolute judicial immunity from Haywood's suit, dismissal was proper. Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1243-44 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.