Summary
refusing to find that the policy complained of was so deficient that the policy itself constituted a repudiation of constitutional rights because, though medical care may have been lacking in certain instances, the episodic breakdowns did not lead to the conclusion that the policy itself was a repudiation of constitutional rights or exposed inmates to a substantial risk of significantly unmet serious medical needs, of which supervisory defendants were subjectively aware
Summary of this case from Nevers v. Dep't of Pub. Safety & Corr.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-72-FJP-DLD.
March 16, 2011
OPINION
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report to which no objection was filed:
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment shall be denied, that the Clerk's Entry of Default as to defendants Jolynn Williams, Pam Porter and Carla Hawkins shall be set aside, and that this matter be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
Rec. Doc. Nos. 91, 105 and 112.
Rec. Doc. No. 88.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana.