Opinion
Nos. 05-08-01670-CR, 05-08-01671-CR, 05-08-01672-CR
Opinion Filed October 26, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F03-22022-RK, F03-22031-RK, F03-22032-RK.
Before Justices MOSELEY, FITZGERALD, and LANG-MIERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kelon Todd Haynie appeals following the adjudication of his guilt for three forgery-by-check offenses. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 32.21(b), (d) (Vernon Supp. 2009). Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support these appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgment in each case.