From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAYNES v. ULEP

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Feb 23, 2007
NO: 5:06CV00085 GH (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2007)

Opinion

NO: 5:06CV00085 GH.

February 23, 2007


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young, and the objections filed. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Ulep and Sagosiny are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and their names are removed as party Defendants.

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

4. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.


Summaries of

HAYNES v. ULEP

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Feb 23, 2007
NO: 5:06CV00085 GH (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2007)
Case details for

HAYNES v. ULEP

Case Details

Full title:WALTER HAYNES ADC #111110 PLAINTIFF v. BENJAMIN ULEP et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

NO: 5:06CV00085 GH (E.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2007)

Citing Cases

Laster v. Pramstaller

In these circumstances, plaintiff bears the responsibility for the failure to effectuate service, and the…