Opinion
Nos. 14-05-00235-CR, 14-05-00236-CR
Memorandum Opinion filed July 21, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P.47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 174th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. 970,848 970,849. Affirmed.
Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices FOWLER and FROST.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant entered guilty pleas to two aggravated robbery offenses. On March 1, 2005, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for forty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in each case, with the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case. Appellant's appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes these appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Copies of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se response in each case. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). More than forty-five days have elapsed, and as of this date, no pro se response has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel's briefs and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the records. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.