See Flores v. State, 277 Ga. App. 211, 214 (4) ( 626 SE2d 181) (2006). See also Mitchell v. State, 249 Ga. App. 520, 523 (2) ( 548 SE2d 469) (2001) (defendant's predisposition can be shown by his "[r]eady commission of [the] criminal act"); Haynes v. State, 230 Ga. App. 107, 108-109 (2) ( 495 SE2d 591) (1998) (informant's request for contraband, without more, does not show undue persuasion, incitement or deceit). Under these circumstances, the trial court committed no error in failing to charge the jury on entrapment. See Maldonado v. State, 284 Ga. App. 26, 30 (4) ( 643 SE2d 316) (2007); Campbell, 281 Ga. App. at 503-504 (1); Flores, 277 Ga. App. at 213-214 (4); Haynes, 230 Ga. App. at 108-109 (2); Byrd v. State, 211 Ga. App. 881, 881-882 (1) ( 440 SE2d 764) (1994).
Thus, the trial court did not err in failing to charge the jury on entrapment. See id. at 564 (2); Mitchell v. State, 249 Ga. App. 520, 523 (2) ( 548 SE2d 469) (2001) (a defendant's predisposition to commit a particular crime can be shown by his "[r]eady commission of [the] criminal act"); Haynes v. State, 230 Ga. App. 107, 108-109 (2) ( 495 SE2d 591) (1998) (a confidential informant's request for drugs, without more, does not show undue persuasion, incitement, or deceit). 3. Based on our holding in Division 1, it is unneccessary to address Quarterman's remaining enumerations of error.
(Citation omitted.) Haynes v. State, 230 Ga. App. 107, 108 (2) ( 495 SE2d 591) (1998); see OCGA § 16-3-25. "There is no entrapment where the agent merely furnishes an opportunity to a defendant who is ready to commit the offense. . . . Absent other circumstances, it is generally held that where an agent simply makes a request, as to purchase contraband, and there is ready compliance, the defense of entrapment is not available."
See Isaac v. State, 275 Ga. App. 254 ( 620 SE2d 483) (2005). A police officer's request for drugs, in response to the defendant asking what the officer needs, is not entrapment. See Haynes v. State, 230 Ga. App. 107, 108-109 (2) ( 495 SE2d 591) (1998). The officer testified that while working undercover, he drove his vehicle into the parking lot of a gas station in a known drug trafficking area. Chandler approached the officer and asked the officer what he needed.
[Hinton] presented no evidence of the second element." (Citation omitted) Haynes v. State, 230 Ga. App. 107, 108 (2) ( 495 S.E.2d 591) (1998). Moreover, "[i]t does not constitute entrapment where a defendant approaches a police officer . . . with an offer to commit a crime, if that officer then plays a role in order to provide the defendant with an opportunity to commit the intended offense."