From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Mosker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0368 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0368 KJM P.

September 30, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 17) is denied.


Summaries of

Haynes v. Mosker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0368 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Haynes v. Mosker

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN MOSKER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0368 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)