From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Loring

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 21, 1954
269 P.2d 528 (Or. 1954)

Opinion

Argued April 14, 1954

Affirmed April 21, 1954

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County, FORREST HUBBARD and JAMES W. CRAWFORD, Judges.

Theodore S. Bloom argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Lenske, Spiegel, Spiegel, Martindale Bloom, of Portland.

Warde H. Erwin argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Boyd, Ferris Erwin, of Portland.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, LUSK and TOOZE, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


This is a suit for reformation of a contract for the sale of real property, and for specific performance thereof as reformed, brought by R.W. Haynes, as plaintiff, against Michael Loring and his wife, as defendants. Decree was entered in favor of plaintiff as prayed for in his complaint. Defendants appeal.

We have examined the record in this case and find no merit in the appeal. Hayward v. Morrison et ux., 194 Or. 335, 241 P.2d 888; Young v. Neill et al., 190 Or. 161, 220 P.2d 89, 225 P.2d 66.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Haynes v. Loring

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 21, 1954
269 P.2d 528 (Or. 1954)
Case details for

Haynes v. Loring

Case Details

Full title:HAYNES v. LORING ET UX

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 21, 1954

Citations

269 P.2d 528 (Or. 1954)
269 P.2d 528