From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Jimenez

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Jan 13, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:05-cv-00820 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:05-cv-00820.

January 13, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Second Letter-Form Motion for Reconsideration [Docket 40]. Plaintiff previously filed a Letter-Form Motion for Reconsideration [Docket 38], which the Court denied by Memorandum Opinion and Order [Docket 39] entered on November 12, 2008. In the instant motion, Plaintiff largely restates the merits of his claim. Pursuant to Rule 60, a court may relieve a party from a judgment for "any . . . reason that justifies relief." Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). Here, Plaintiff offers no justification for such relief other than the conclusory statement that he has "a constitutional right to be heard." (Docket 40 at 2.) Plaintiff's right to be heard was vindicated when he filed his suit in October 2005. The Court has determined that he is not entitled to relief on his claims and Plaintiff has failed to provide any cognizable rationale to occasion the Court to reconsider its determination. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration [Docket 40] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Haynes v. Jimenez

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Jan 13, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:05-cv-00820 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2009)
Case details for

Haynes v. Jimenez

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HAYNES, Plaintiff, v. DR. TEODORO JIMENEZ and PRIMECARE MEDICAL OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division

Date published: Jan 13, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:05-cv-00820 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 13, 2009)