From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1951
279 App. Div. 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

October 30, 1951.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


Order, denying plaintiff's motion for the entry of judgment for arrears of alimony, unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. We affirm the order denying the motion to punish for contempt because we feel the court at Special Term had the right to find, under all the circumstances presented, that the conduct of the defendant was not contumacious. The defendant, however, was not entitled to any credit for alimony payments in a larger amount made by him prior to the entry of the order of modification; for that reason we reverse the second order and grant plaintiff's motion. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Haynes v. Haynes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 1951
279 App. Div. 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Haynes v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE E. HAYNES, Appellant, v. STEPHEN B. HAYNES, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1951

Citations

279 App. Div. 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Foley v. Foley

A similar case is Chaisson v. Domingue, La. App., 175 So.2d 902 (1965). When alimony is reduced by court…