Haynes v. City of Middletown

Full title: Tracey HAYNES et al. v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN.

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jul 25, 2013

70 A.3d 1067 (Conn. 2013)

309 Conn. 919

Opinion

2013-07-25

Tracey HAYNES et al. v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN.

William F. Gallagher and Hugh D. Hughes, New Haven, in support of the petition. Matthew Dallas Gordon, West Hartford, Ruth Kurien, Nicholas N. Ouellette, West Hartford, and Dierdre Dwyer Stokes, in opposition.

William F. Gallagher and Hugh D. Hughes, New Haven, in support of the petition. Matthew Dallas Gordon, West Hartford, Ruth Kurien, Nicholas N. Ouellette, West Hartford, and Dierdre Dwyer Stokes, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 142 Conn.App. 720, 66 A.3d 899, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court judgment setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs should be affirmed on the ground that the plaintiffs had not satisfied the identifiable person, imminent harm exception to governmental immunity?”

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.