Haynes v. Bank of America

Full title: TRACY A. HAYNES, Sr., an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANK OF…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 25, 2011

444 F. App'x 966 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-56803.

Submitted July 12, 2011.^__

__ The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

July 25, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Valerie Baker Fairbank, District Judge, Presiding D.C. No. 2:09-cv-03579-VBF-SS.

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^_

_ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Tracy A. Haynes, Sr., appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th Cir. 1986). We affirm.

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on November 4, 2009 dismissing Haynes's second amended complaint.

Haynes's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We do not consider Haynes's arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1223 (9th Cir. 2007).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.