From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haynes v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. CA 07-01877.

October 2, 2009.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), dated July 27, 2007 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment vacated the determination of the Board of Parole and ordered a de novo parole release hearing.

TIMMIE L. HAYNES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.

ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (ANDREW B. AYERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Peradotto, Green and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: This appeal by petitioner from a judgment vacating the determination of the Board of Parole and ordering a de novo hearing must be dismissed. Petitioner has since been released to parole supervision and potential discharge, thus rendering the appeal moot, and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply herein ( see People ex rel. Mitchell v Unger, 63 AD3d 1591; People ex rel. Hampton v Dennison, 59 AD3d 951, lv denied 12 NY3d 711).


Summaries of

Haynes v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2009
66 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Haynes v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TIMMIE L. HAYNES, Appellant, v. GEORGE ALEXANDER, Acting…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2009

Citations

66 A.D.3d 1348 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6898
885 N.Y.S.2d 681