From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayner v. Burns

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 4, 1962
370 P.2d 235 (Or. 1962)

Opinion

Argued March 5, 1962

Affirmed April 4, 1962

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County.

JAMES M. MAIN, Judge.

Bruce J. Manley, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was John M. Ross, Medford.

Ervin B. Hogan, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frohnmayer, Lowry, Hogan Deatherage, Medford.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN and O'CONNELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


In his abstract and brief plaintiff states that this is a proceeding in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. It was claimed that plaintiff and defendant Robert Burns formed a partnership to exploit some mining claims in Colorado.

At the conclusion of the trial and later by a written opinion, the trial court found a complete lack of any evidence sustaining plaintiff's claim. We agree with the court. The record is devoid of any evidence to establish a claim of right of any kind in favor of plaintiff against defendants. The facts are of interest only to the parties. They do not justify statement here.

Decree affirmed.


Summaries of

Hayner v. Burns

Oregon Supreme Court
Apr 4, 1962
370 P.2d 235 (Or. 1962)
Case details for

Hayner v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:HAYNER v. BURNS ET UX

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Apr 4, 1962

Citations

370 P.2d 235 (Or. 1962)
370 P.2d 235