From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haymes v. Haymes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 1990
157 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


While clearly the Supreme Court has the power to appoint an independent appraiser (Zirinsky v. Zirinsky, 138 A.D.2d 43; Uniform Rules for Trial Cts, 22 NYCRR 202.18), nevertheless, the denial of such relief under the circumstances of this case did not constitute an abuse of discretion. (Murphy v. Murphy, 145 A.D.2d 857, 858.) The action is at an early stage, with discovery still in progress. Further, the plaintiff has already obtained an expert and, at least at this point, has not established that the husband's affairs are so complex that it is necessary for the court to appoint an appraiser.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.


Summaries of

Haymes v. Haymes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 1990
157 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Haymes v. Haymes

Case Details

Full title:GAIL L. HAYMES, Appellant, v. STEPHEN D. HAYMES, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 5

Citing Cases

Pryba v. Pryba

However, insofar as the motion was for reargument, no appeal lies; insofar as the motion was for renewal,…

Pinon v. 99 Lynn Ave LLC

Here. Vickers has established that Pinon was the sole proximate cause of his injuries. It has been held that…