From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayman v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 23, 1926
107 So. 635 (Fla. 1926)

Opinion

Opinion Filed February 23, 1926.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hardee County; George W. Whitehurst, Judge.

Reversed for appropriate proceedings.

A. Yancy Teachy, for Plaintiff in Error;

L. Grady Burton, for Defendant in Error.


In an action by the payee on a retain title note given by the defendant for the balance of the purchase price of an automobile, the declaration alleged no damages sustained by the plaintiff, the court struck the pleas, including a plea of failure of consideration, and rendered judgment by default, and damages were assessed by a jury as "principal $625.00, interest $70.00, attorney's fee $119.50, total $814.50." Judgment for "the said sum of $814.50 as damages" was rendered and the defendant took writ of error. The amended second plea was not amenable to the motion to strike and the declaration contains a defective ad damnum clause.

Reversed for appropriate proceedings.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

BROWN, C. J., AND ELLIS AND STRUM, J. J., concur in the opinion.


Summaries of

Hayman v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 23, 1926
107 So. 635 (Fla. 1926)
Case details for

Hayman v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:G. H. HAYMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. E. F. MITCHELL, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Feb 23, 1926

Citations

107 So. 635 (Fla. 1926)
107 So. 635