From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayle v. Cowan

Superior Court of North Carolina MORGANTON —
Sep 1, 1793
2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)

Opinion

September Term, 1793

Witnesses subpoenaed and attending can prove their attendance, though not examined.

PETITION to rectify error in a patent, heard by the Court without the intervention of a jury; and the error was ordered to be rectified agreeably to the act of Assembly. This was in the case of a royal patent, and Hayle had summoned four witnesses, the dispute being only whether the first line described in the certificate annexed was (22) really north 54 degrees east or south 54 degrees east. Mr. Avery then moved that as two of these witnesses had not been sworn at all, and as there could be but one fact to be established, that the defendant should not be subject to the payment of these two witnesses.


You informed us a while ago, you had a witness summoned who does not attend. These two witnesses not sworn might be intended to counteract his testimony, and your not producing him might be the reason why they were not called upon. We cannot undertake to say they were to prove the same fact the other two were sworn to.

Motion denied.

Cited: Holmes v. Johnson, 33 N.C. 59; See Carpenter v. Taylor, 4 N.C. 689.


Summaries of

Hayle v. Cowan

Superior Court of North Carolina MORGANTON —
Sep 1, 1793
2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)
Case details for

Hayle v. Cowan

Case Details

Full title:HAYLE v. COWAN

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina MORGANTON —

Date published: Sep 1, 1793

Citations

2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Super. 1793)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Johnson

Commonly, two witnesses to any one fact are sufficient to establish it. But others may become necessary and…