From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayhurst v. O'Malley

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 14, 2024
3:24-cv-00649 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-00649

08-14-2024

MARY HAYHURST, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

MARTIN O'MALLEY MARY HAYHURST, Carla B. Freedman, Peter A. Gorton Shannon Fishe


MARTIN O'MALLEY

MARY HAYHURST,

Carla B. Freedman,

Peter A. Gorton

Shannon Fishe

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REMAND

THERESE WILEY DANCKS, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The parties stipulate that, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner's final decision be reversed and that this action be remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. The parties agree that on remand, the Commissioner will offer the plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, take further action as necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new decision. The parties consent to the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

Hayhurst v. O'Malley

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Aug 14, 2024
3:24-cv-00649 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Hayhurst v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:MARY HAYHURST, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Aug 14, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-00649 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2024)