From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haygood v. R. Ruiz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
2:20-cv-1698 AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1698 AC P

08-03-2021

DEON HAYGOOD, Plaintiff, v. R. RUIZ, Defendant.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Ruiz violated his First Amendment right to be free from retaliation when filing grievances. See generally ECF No. 1.

On July 29, 2021, defendant Ruiz filed a motion to opt out of the post-screening ADR Project. ECF No. 19. After reviewing the motion, the court finds good cause to grant it.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to opt out (ECF No. 19) is GRANTED, and the stay of this action is LIFTED, and

2. Within twenty-one days from the date of this order, defendant shall file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Haygood v. R. Ruiz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
2:20-cv-1698 AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Haygood v. R. Ruiz

Case Details

Full title:DEON HAYGOOD, Plaintiff, v. R. RUIZ, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1698 AC P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)