From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Supply House

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1932
166 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1932)

Opinion

(Filed 2 November, 1932.)

APPEAL by defendant from Daniels, J., at March Term, 1932, of WAYNE.

B. F. Aycock and Kenneth C. Royall for plaintiff.

E. McA. Currie and Langston, Allen Taylor for defendant.


Civil action to recover for alleged breach of exclusive right, granted the plaintiff by the defendant, to distribute Pennzoil products in certain counties of North Carolina.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


On controverted issues of fact, involving different understanding and opposite contentions of the parties, the jury has found in favor of the plaintiff. A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the principles of law applicable and the authoritative decisions on the questions raised by the defendant's 207 exceptions and assignments of error. It is not to be expected that we should discuss the assignments seriatim, for, to do so, would require an opinion of intolerable length. S. v. Lea, ante, 13.

No error.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Supply House

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1932
166 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1932)
Case details for

Hayes v. Supply House

Case Details

Full title:F. A. HAYES v. CAROLINA AUTO SUPPLY HOUSE, INCORPORATED

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1932

Citations

166 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1932)
166 S.E. 925