From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 10, 2009
297 S.W.3d 137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92359.

November 10, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0822-CC00871, Margaret Mary Neill, Judge.

Timothy J. Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Terrence Michael Messonnier, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before GLENN A. NORTON, P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.



ORDER


Marvin Hayes (Movant) appeals from the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (Judgment) overruling his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant sought to vacate his convictions for one count of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000, and for one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, for which he was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten years' imprisonment. We affirm.

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hayes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 10, 2009
297 S.W.3d 137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Hayes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Marvin HAYES, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

297 S.W.3d 137 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)