From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Rosenbaum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 29, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-13583 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-13583

11-29-2016

MELANIE R. HAYES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROSENBAUM, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

On October 6, 2016, Plaintiff Melanie R. Hayes filed a Complaint alleging that Defendant David Rosenbaum breached a contract for the sale of Plaintiff's company. ECF No. 1. All pretrial matters in the case were referred to Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris on October 12, 2016. ECF No. 5. On October 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 7. On October 31, 2016, Magistrate Judge Morris issued a report recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be sua sponte dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The report and recommendation explained that the Complaint did not include a federal cause of action on its face. The report further explained that Plaintiff had failed to join an indispensable party, the entity which had contracted to buy the business. Because joinder of that party would destroy complete diversity, the Magistrate Judge concluded that the case must be dismissed. The report further recommended that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel should be denied as moot.

Two documents titled "Report and Recommendation" have been filed on the docket. ECF Nos. 8, 9. The two are materially identical. Because a clerical error resulted in the first filing, that report and recommendation will be rejected as moot. --------

Although the Magistrate Judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, neither Plaintiff nor Defendant filed any objections. The election not to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, ECF No. 9, is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the duplicate report and recommendation, ECF No. 8, is REJECTED as moot.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Melanie R. Hayes's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 7, is DENIED as moot.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff Melanie R. Hayes's Complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED. Dated: November 29, 2016

s/Thomas L. Ludington

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 29, 2016.

s/Michael A. Sian

MICHAEL A. SIAN, Case Manager


Summaries of

Hayes v. Rosenbaum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 29, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-13583 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Hayes v. Rosenbaum

Case Details

Full title:MELANIE R. HAYES, Plaintiff, v. DAVID ROSENBAUM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-13583 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 29, 2016)