From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Howell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 21, 2022
2:20-cv-00945-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00945-GMN-BNW

01-21-2022

JAMES H. HAYES, Petitioner, v. JERRY HOWELL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

James H. Hayes' pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition is before the court on several motions for extension of time and a motion for copies. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' six motions for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF Nos. 40, 42, 44, 45, 48, 50) are all GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to expedite petition (ECF No. 39) is DENIED as moot because respondents have answered the petition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for copies (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to SEND to petitioner one copy of the docket sheet and one copy of petitioner's addendum at ECF No. 6.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Howell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 21, 2022
2:20-cv-00945-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Hayes v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:JAMES H. HAYES, Petitioner, v. JERRY HOWELL, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 21, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-00945-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Jan. 21, 2022)