From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAYES v. HAJ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

October, 1935.

Present — Sears, P.J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The last two paragraphs of the statement of facts in the respondents' brief deleted. We note a growing tendency to include in briefs matter extraneous to the record. Including such matter is of course improper and sometimes, as in this case, reprehensible. All concur. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Buffalo City Court dismissing the complaint in an automobile negligence action.)


Summaries of

HAYES v. HAJ

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1935
246 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

HAYES v. HAJ

Case Details

Full title:HENRY G. HAYES, Appellant, v. ANTHONY HAJ and Another, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1935

Citations

246 App. Div. 568 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Padilla v. Greyhound Lines

No countervailing circumstances are present, in our opinion, which might warrant the designation of New York…

Matter of Niagara Cty. v. Board of Assessors

In view of the undecided issue concerning location, we did not reach the question whether the water line is…