From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Fernandez

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 3, 1985
335 S.E.2d 735 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

71158.

DECIDED OCTOBER 3, 1985.

Medical malpractice. Clayton Superior Court. Before Judge Ison.

Robert C. Edwards, for appellant.

William L. Ballard, Michael V. Stephens II, Sidney F. Wheeler, Robert D. Roll, for appellees.


The appellant sued the appellees to recover for alleged medical malpractice. The trial court granted the appellees' motion for summary judgment on the ground that the affidavits filed by the appellant in response to the motion were not timely under Rule 21 of the local rules of the Superior Court of Clayton County. Held:

Although Rule 21 is not before us, and we may not take judicial cognizance of it (see Harris v. Harris, 228 Ga. 562 (1) ( 187 S.E.2d 139) (1972)), it is apparent from the trial court's order, as well as the briefs of the parties, that the appellant's response was filed within the time limitations imposed by the CPA and that the court's order was accordingly in error. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c) provides, in pertinent part, that "[t]he party opposing a motion for summary judgment has until the day prior to the hearing to serve opposing affidavits, unless the trial court in its discretion permits them to be served at a later date [OCGA § 9-11-6 (d)]." Gross v. Pyrofax Gas Corp., 151 Ga. App. 130 ( 259 S.E.2d 137) (1979). The actual filing of the response with the court need not be accomplished, under the statute, until the date of the hearing itself. See Martin v. Newman, 162 Ga. App. 725 (2) ( 293 S.E.2d 18) (1982); Suttle v. Northside Realty Assoc., 171 Ga. App. 928 (2) ( 321 S.E.2d 424) (1984).

The record in this case establishes that the hearing on the appellees" summary judgment motion was set for January 9, 1985, and that the appellant both filed and served his opposing brief and affidavits on January 7, 1985. "Local court rules `may control the flow of business, the hearing of cases, etc., but may not contravene the substantive framework of the CPA.' [Cit.]" Gilbert v. Decker, 165 Ga. App. 11, 12 ( 299 S.E.2d 65) (1983).

Judgment reversed. McMurray, P. J., and Benham, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 3, 1985.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Fernandez

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 3, 1985
335 S.E.2d 735 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Hayes v. Fernandez

Case Details

Full title:HAYES v. FERNANDEZ et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 3, 1985

Citations

335 S.E.2d 735 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985)
335 S.E.2d 735

Citing Cases

Pruitt v. Tyler

Accordingly, the Rules cannot have the same force as statutory law and, it follows that, in a conflict with…

Cook Pecan Co. v. McDaniel

See Georgia–Pacific, LLC v. Fields , 293 Ga. 499, 504, 748 S.E.2d 407 (2013) ; Bailey v. Hall , 267 Ga.App.…