From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes v. Coos Curry Manpower

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 1991
813 P.2d 1065 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

WCB 88-06310, 88-08392; CA A65602

Argued and submitted February 20, 1991

Affirmed June 12, 1991 Reconsideration allowed by opinion September 4, 1991

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Eveleen Henry, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Rasmussen Henry, Eugene.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents Coos Curry Manpower and SAIF Corp. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Kenneth Kleinsmith, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Safeway Stores, Inc. With him on the brief was Meyers Radler, Portland.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order denying her attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1). We affirm.

Claimant has a form of asthma, for which SAIF's insured, Coos Curry Manpower (Coos), accepted responsibility in 1980. She began experiencing increased symptoms in 1987, after she began working for Safeway. She filed an aggravation claim against Coos, for which SAIF denied responsibility. Claimant sought a hearing and moved to join Safeway, a self-insured employer. Safeway denied both compensability and responsibility. After the hearing, but before the decision, the parties stipulated that Coos would accept the aggravation claim and that Safeway's denial would be affirmed. The parties reserved the issue of attorney fees for the referee to decide. The referee entered an order dismissing with prejudice claimant's request for a hearing, except on the issue of attorney fees, and ordered Safeway to pay $4,650 in fees. The Board reversed that award, reasoning that claimant had not finally prevailed against Safeway, because its denial was affirmed.

Claimant contends that she is entitled to attorney fees from either Coos or Safeway under ORS 656.386(1). She is not. Jones v. OSCI, 107 Or. App. 78, 810 P.2d 1318 (1991).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hayes v. Coos Curry Manpower

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 1991
813 P.2d 1065 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hayes v. Coos Curry Manpower

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Dorothy J. Hayes, Claimant. Dorothy…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 4, 1991

Citations

813 P.2d 1065 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
813 P.2d 1065

Citing Cases

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Hayes

ROSSMAN, P.J. Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board on remand from our…

Gates v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

Initially, we affirmed the Board's decision based on our holding in Jones v. OSCI, 107 Or. App. 78, 810 P.2d…