From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayes-Hunt v. Crossmark Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2013
1:13-cv-01183 AWI SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)

Opinion


JENNIFER HAYES-HUNT, Plaintiff, v. CROSSMARK INC., Defendant. No. 1:13-cv-01183 AWI SKO United States District Court, E.D. California. December 4, 2013

          ORDER

          SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

         On July 29, 2013, the Court issued an Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference ("Order"). The Order explicitly instructed the parties as to the preparation of a Joint Scheduling Report to be filed in advance of the scheduling conference:

A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference, and shall be e-mailed, in WordPerfect or Word format.

         The scheduling conference is set for December 10, 2013. The parties have failed to timely file their Joint Scheduling Report. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, no later than 12:00 p.m. (noon), December 5, 2013, the parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report or show cause why the Court should not impose sanctions under Local Rule 110 for failing to comply with an order of this Court.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hayes-Hunt v. Crossmark Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2013
1:13-cv-01183 AWI SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Hayes-Hunt v. Crossmark Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER HAYES-HUNT, Plaintiff, v. CROSSMARK INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-01183 AWI SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)