From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 12, 2024
2:21-cv-436-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-436-NPM

03-12-2024

Robert E. Hayer, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

NICHOLAS P. MIZEUL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Having obtained an award of benefits, Robert E. Hayer requests a fee award pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. 37). Section 406(b) allows an award of a reasonable fee-not to exceed twenty-five percent of the claimant's past-due benefits-for work performed before the court. And for the reasons stated in Hayer's motion, the requested fee award is reasonable.

Accordingly, the unopposed fee motion (Doc. 37) is GRANTED, and the clerk is directed to amend the judgment in favor of Hayer to include a fee award of $17,504.

Because Hayer's counsel previously retained the $7,879.32 in fees awarded to Hayer under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), they must refund the EAJA fees to Hayer.


Summaries of

Hayer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Mar 12, 2024
2:21-cv-436-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Hayer v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Robert E. Hayer, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Mar 12, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-436-NPM (M.D. Fla. Mar. 12, 2024)