From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haye v. M.C.F., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued December 13, 1999

February 10, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant M.C.F., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lisa, J.), dated February 22, 1999, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Bivona Cohen, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Robert G. Macchia of counsel), for appellant.

Malcolm Fein, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondents.

DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the appellant's motion, as it did not make out a prima facie case that it was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law (see, CPLR 3212[b]).


Summaries of

Haye v. M.C.F., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 2000
269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Haye v. M.C.F., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO HAYE, et al., respondents, v. M.C.F., INC., appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
702 N.Y.S.2d 570