From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hayden v. Gokenbach

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 5, 1991
190 Mich. App. 489 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

Docket No. 104905.

Decided August 5, 1991, at 9:10 A.M.

Sommers, Schwartz, Silver Schwartz, P.C. (by David J. Winter and Patrick Burkett), for Kermit D. Hayden.

Cummings, McClorey, Davis Acho, P.C. (by Timothy Young and Marcia L. Howe), for Hartford Accident Indemnity Company.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and SHEPHERD and MARILYN KELLY, JJ.


AFTER REMAND


This case involves the propriety of the Macomb Circuit Court's decision to quash substituted service of the summons and complaint on the defendant's insurer, Hartford Accident Indemnity Company.

In our previous opinion we held that, if Hartford is liable for plaintiff's damages in the event defendant Gokenbach is found negligent, then the substituted service on Hartford was good. We remanded the case for a determination of whether Gokenbach was covered under the insurance policy, and we retained jurisdiction. Hayden v Gokenbach, 179 Mich. App. 594; 446 N.W.2d 332 (1989).

On remand, the trial court found that plaintiff was a named insured under the policy and that, since Gokenbach was driving with plaintiff's permission, the policy covered him as well. These findings are not clearly erroneous. MCR 2.613(C). Thus, the substituted service on Hartford was proper.

The order quashing service is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Hayden v. Gokenbach

Michigan Court of Appeals
Aug 5, 1991
190 Mich. App. 489 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hayden v. Gokenbach

Case Details

Full title:HAYDEN v GOKENBACH (AFTER REMAND)

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 5, 1991

Citations

190 Mich. App. 489 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991)
476 N.W.2d 446