From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haworth v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Jul 31, 2008
No. B204354 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 31, 2008)

Opinion


RANDAL D. HAWORTH et al., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent SUSAN AMY OSSAKOW, Real Party in Interest. B204354 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Fifth Division July 31, 2008

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC082441.

ORDER MODIFYING DISSENTING OPINION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

MOSK, J., Dissenting

It is ordered that the dissenting opinion filed July 10, 2008, be modified as follows:

Delete the second full paragraph on page 10 of the dissenting opinion (“Lest one . . .) and in its place insert the following paragraph.

“Moreover, the trial court’s position might well require disclosure by one who had decades earlier carried out or complied with the policies of a law firm or club that would not admit female lawyers or members. And it might cover those who did what Judge Gordon did but were never reported or disciplined.”


Summaries of

Haworth v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Jul 31, 2008
No. B204354 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Haworth v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:RANDAL D. HAWORTH et al., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2008

Citations

No. B204354 (Cal. Ct. App. Jul. 31, 2008)