From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haworth v. Bradley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2021
Case No. CV 20-07950-RGK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-07950-RGK (PD)

01-04-2021

RICHARD HAWORTH, Petitioner, v. PATRICIA V. BRADLEY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No. objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

As a federal prisoner proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner is not required to obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in this case. See Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 2008) (plain language of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) does not require federal prisoners bringing section 2241 petitions to obtain a certificate of appealability to appeal, unless the section 2241 petition is a section 2255 petition in disguise"). Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Haworth v. Bradley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2021
Case No. CV 20-07950-RGK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Haworth v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HAWORTH, Petitioner, v. PATRICIA V. BRADLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2021

Citations

Case No. CV 20-07950-RGK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2021)