Rose v. Spies, 44 Mo. 20; Barr v. Kansas City, 105 Mo. 550, 16 S.W. 483; Littig v. Heating Co., 237 S.W. 779; Zumwalt v. Railroad Co., 266 S.W. 717; Causey v. Wittig, 11 S.W.2d 11; Leeser v. Boekhoff, 33 Mo. App. 222; McAllister v. Irvine, 69 Mo. App. 442; Lux v. Bank, 148 Mo. App. 376, 128 S.W. 19, 46 S.W.2d 849. (4) Plaintiff did not, as a matter of law, assume the risk of the switch being too close to the track. Choctaw, etc., Railroad Co. v. McDade, 191 U.S. 64, 24 Sup. Ct. 24; Hawley v. Railroad Co., 133 F. 150; Railroad Co. v. Beckett, 163 F. 479; Harvey v. Railroad Co., 166 F. 384; West v. Railroad Co., 179 F. 801; Railroad Co. v. Conley, 187 F. 949; Railroad Co. v. Rogers, 196 F. 286; Railroad Co. v. Morland, 239 F. 1; Tabor v. Director Gen., 280 F. 612; Davis v. Crane Co., 12 F.2d 355; Railroad Co. v. Garey, 47 F.2d 142; Charleton v. Railroad Co., 200 Mo. 413; Fish v. Railroad Co., 263 Mo. 106; McIntyre v. Railroad Co., 227 S.W. 1047; Westover v. Railroad Co., 6 S.W.2d 843; Railroad Co. v. Robins, 23 S.W.2d 461; Colf v. Railroad Co., 58 N.E. 408; Paddock v. Railroad Co., 19 P. 191; Railroad Co. v. Michaels, 46 P. 938; Bonner v. Railroad Co., 15 S.W. 803; Vickory v. Railroad Co., 89 A. 277; Harve v. Railroad Co., 166 F. 384; West v. Railroad Co., 179 F. 801; Hawley v. Ry. Co., 133 F. 150; Railroad Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U.S. 415, 41 Sup. Ct. 162; Ford v. Railroad Co., 217 S.W. 294. (5) The evidence proved a case under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Sullivan v. Railroad Co., 12 S.W.